Abrekt Dynasty

Sharing some progress pics of my Necrons Dynasty.

The Blades-Errant

Banner Name: The Seeking Blades
Seneschal: Cerastus Knight Atrapos “Dáinsleif”

Preceptor: Questoris Knight Warden. “Lux”

Scion: Questoris Knight Paladin, “Terminus”

Scion Arbalester: Questoris Knight Crusader-Obliterator. “Dawnspear”

Scion Implacable: Cerastus Knight Acheron, “Rust”

Sword-Hounds: Knight Armiger Warglaives “Gáe Buidhe” and “Gáe Dearg”
Knight House: “The Blades-Errant”
Owner: Samuel “Nusquam”
Location: Vermont, USA
Comments: “A band of Legendary Freeblades that were formed under Malcador the Sigilite in the same manner as the Knights-Errant; These questing blades seek other freeblades in an effort to unite them under the banner of the Emperor or slay those who have turned to Horus. Their names lost to time, only legends of their knight armors striking out in the defense of mankind linger in the far reaches of the galaxy where hope has no home.”

Knights are my favorite part of Warhammer lore and their kits are fun to paint and customize. As shown with my Crusader and plastic Cerastus conversion. I'll be adding more Armigers and a Castellan upon their individual release.

Fully Painted Raptors Army

First Game with Issodon/Atrapos

So my Templar friend and I did a Power 70 game.

I took:

• Captain with Relic plade and combi plas
• 10 sniper scouts with camo and a ML
• 5 bolter scouts with a HB
• LSS
• 10 Tacs with a combi plas, plas, and grav cannon
• Rhino
• Knight Crusader with RFBC

He Took:

• High Marshall
• Crusade squad loaded for CC
• LRC
• Stormtalon
• Knight Paladin

We did the Search and Destroy deployment and Retrieval mission. I wont do a play by play but LRs soak up serious damage. Knights RFBC can be puny or hilariously dangerous. Stormtalons are scary with twin assault cannons. Using rhinos to ram LRs is hilarious and effective. The new movement values are pretty cool. Contemptors are really fast.

Nusquam, on 31 May 2017 - 10:56 PM, said:Also more on the cover thing, units only get cover if they are all entirely on or in terrain. Not if they obscured by it, or if one model is out of it. Only in optional terrain rules do only vehicles and monsters get cover by being obscured. Infantry never get cover by being obscured unless they are withing 1" of a barricade that separates them from the shooter. That's pretty weird.

Also I really don't like the new cover system.

I also want to invest in some assassins as well. Eversors assaulting from 9.01" for 3d6"(+"1") turn one is scary. Vindicares are going to mulch characters.

Plastic Cerastus Knight Acheron Conversion

I wasn't happy with how the Lancers Lance was looking. So I made a flame cannon just to see how it would look. Much better in my opinion, so Acheron it is now.

Knights

Knight WIP

Marble is hard.

Plastic Cerastus Lancer Conversion

Well I decided to push my conversion skills after I decided I would never actually use a Gallant. So here's my attempts at a plastic Knight Lancer.

 Lengthening the legs and lance parts

Post filling on the legs, but pre filing/evening out

Post filing, filling, and evening.. I'll do another pass on them to get the shape better. The green rod I'll be using for my my piston lengths.

In lieu of a normal shield I decided to go with a buckler. The Renegade box comes with some building bits that, namely the big Aquila door, I'm tempted to convert into a tower shield.

Almost Complete XIX Legion Tacticals and Tactical Support

Raptors Chapter Land Speeder Storm and Devastators

Time to Take Back Warhammer 40k

With all this talk of Escalation and Stronghold, the community has been ablaze with chatter. The following is an analysis of what I have noticed and what could be the start of what we all really want. Now, obviously all these points don't apply to everyone or every event, but bear with me.

Is it "balanced"? What do we have to do to balance it if it isn't?

There's no fixing the balance in Warhammer 40k perfectly, time to stop trying.

There, I said it.

Let's look at what tournaments are considering and what, perhaps, they should ultimately do.

Banning D weapons brings us back to the Screamerstar, Riptide spam and Serpent spam days. Then we ban the grimoire, limit the availability of of Riptides and Wave Serpents. Then what have we done? We've chopped up the game in hopes of this thing called "balance". It's still not perfect. This isn't chess, it never will be. Units don't mirror each other across the codices so that each codex is similar. This alone creates unit-to-unit imbalance. Which is the entire point of different armies. It's when players start min-maxing and using gimmicks to abuse the system that the real problems occur.

Since when has this hobby been so reliant on tournaments to tell us whats acceptable and whats not? Can we not discuss things before hand with our opponents? Sure we can, but when it comes to a tournament some feel "forced" to play against things they don't like and are scored on it. This score directly influences how they place during the day.

That's wrong.

Warhammer 40k is not designed for tournaments where  the sole objective is winning. That's only a third of the game. So why should we be scored on only 1/3 of the actual game? Let alone the part that has the most imbalance?

We shouldn't. It's time to take back ALL OF WARHAMMER 40K.

Game-play, Narrative and hobby.

Instead of being scored solely on your list making and tactical prowess, it's time to be scored on sportsmanship and the time and effort you actually put into your army.

Gone should be the days of "40k Tournaments" and forthcoming should be events of simply "Warhammer 40k Day"


Those who paint and collect miniatures primarily shouldn't be subject to those who have more experience playing the game through putting the game first. It's not fair to score based on victories alone. Just as someone has more experience in game-play, some have more experience in painting and converting. Let's level the field and come together.

A day to celebrate the hobby as a whole and the spirit of competition, instead of the prowess of game-system-abuse. Why compete with only the most unbalanced 1/3 of the game when you can compete with the hobby as a whole. Warhammer World and some other events are starting/have done something similar.

Now it's time to take it all the way.

Example system, everything is legal, go nuts:

• One Point for a Victory
• One Point for a fully Painted Army
• One Point for a Positive Sportsmanship Score
• One Point for a Favorite Game Vote
• One Point for a Favorite Army Vote

Missions:

• Neither player has a LoW: BRB Missions
• One player has a LoW: Altar of War: Escalation Missions
• Both players have a LoW: BRB Missions 

It's time to win the day, not just the battles. Face a rude power-gamer? Well he's already missing out on upwards of three possible points. Face a beginner who has lovingly painted his whole army, put time in for a theme and story. Someone who was a blast to play against? The kind of person who has the same spark you had when you started? They now have the advantage over the power-gamer because they care about 40k as a whole. Not just winning. Rules like the above help encourage fun battles.

Now this system, or should better systems be discovered/implemented/improved, puts a lot of responsibility on us. The 40k hobbyists. As it should be. We should be accountable for our hobby. Not put it off on the game systems, altered or otherwise.

Instead of us looking to authorities to figure it, we should be looking next to us. To the fellow hobbyist. If you're already doing that, excellent, keep at it.

Instead of seeking validation through this hobby by just winning, we should seek validation as a whole. Through the stories we tell, through the miniatures we paint, through the effort we put into every part of the hobby.

This is just a starting point. Lets come together over the whole hobby, instead of separating over 1/3 of it. It will only be as good as we make it.



Thoughts?

Simple Alternate D-Weapon Save Rules

Here is a post I just made on B&C. You can follow the conversation here.

"Now, we all know some of the panic D weapons have caused. I personally think they have a place to deal with things like: screamerstars, T10 MCs, Riptide spam, Serpent spam etc. However I can see how adversely these weapons can affect the more casual side of the game should you want to use a SHV in a tournament at a FLGS where you know there aren't all WAAC players that power-game. So how do we tone them down to be able to take down the power lists that abuse the system while still not steamrolling a more casual player.

Just making them S10 AP1 Ignores cover will still splat most thing but screamerstars and riptide spam will laugh it off.

Perhaps a slight alteration to D weapons and how they affect saves. Now lets say that D weapons don't automatically ignore all saves, but only do so on a 5+. This keeps their ability to deal with screamerstars while keep other more casual lists viable. More difficult sure, but significantly more possible.

Thoughts?"

Edit: Perhaps they reduce invul and cover saves to max of 5+? Gets rid of system abuse builds but retains a more casual friendly aspect.

Void Shield Generators and Lava Base

I am really digging the new paints from citadel. They are fantastic. Especially the rust and corrosion.

The earth technical can make for great lava bases as well.

The Real Answer to Escalation Balancing

It's quite simple and very clever on GWs part. You don't need void shields or another LoW if you already have an established army and feel like you need a bit more of a boost. It's  not banning Escalation or banning D weapons.

Just play the Alter of War: Escalation missions in the back of the Escalation book.

They are designed for one player to not have a Lord of War. The missions special rules help level the playing field even further. One mission gives a unit who controls an objective shooting attacks armourbane, fleshbane, skyfire(optional) and interceptor. Imagine a Dev squad with lascannons controlling one of these? Another gives the player without the LoW units outflank and acute senses. Grav/melta bike squad? More like Titan Hunter Squad. Another gives the LoW player a VP for each wound/HP remaining and the non-LoW player a VP for each they dealt. Pus three other missions and more rules I didn't mention.

All these coupled with the new Warlord table that opponents without LoWs get access to... It proves for a very challenging game for the player with the LoW.

More Thoughts on D Weapons

I just had another thought. Things with D weapons are expensive. Crazy expensive. I know a lot of people are concerned they are just "point and remove from pay" weapons but think about the point breakdown:

The cheapest source of SD weapons in Escalation. The Shadowsword's volcano cannon. It's 5" blast SD. That is still going to be almost a third of you points at 1.5k. Know how many lascannons you could get for around 500 points? Depends on codex, but the answer is: A lot. Do you know what can survive that much pewpew? Almost nothing, to the point where it equates to Strength D. Especially the Revenant Titan. 4 D weapons is impressive, but for around 1,000 points you can bring the pain without D weapons if you dedicate it all to big guns, not just lascannons. Plus because it's from different sources you minimize the risk to overkill something. So you don't spend all 1,000 points to kill 200.

What D weapons actually end up doing is reducing the time it takes to destroy things. This helps when some apocalypse games take a few days to complete. In "regular" a term which I use very loosely nowadays, 40k it translates to consolidated firepower as the things that carry them takes up more points.

Now it isn't, say, a "1:1 ratio of time:power" as D weapons in the form of blasts can output a bit more if things are bunched up(pro-tip: don't) but it's closer than you might think. Plus it is a double-edged sword; one source of that much firepower is easier to bring down than say, 6. Also if you lose that superheavy you are out that much instantly, where as multiple units take long to kill of and the power curves down instead of cutting off.

If you want more protection that's when you bring Void Shield Generators. Not only do they protect what you can use to kill titans, but the rest of your army as well.

Against vehicle, a D weapon has a good chance to nuke it. So do 12 lascannons.

D weapons are fearsome, but not the end of the world. I fortunately have enough experience to where I can confidently handle them without bringing a Revenant of my own. If you feel like you don't have enough experience/models etc don't cry "nerf now!" just simply say "Hey, I'm new/poor/not confident my current army can handle D weapons/other valid reason, would you like to play a game without Escalation/D-Weapons?"

It is that easy.

For tournaments, you have to expect every player that to have a min-maxed list that utilize everything available withing the confines of the tournaments structure. So if it allows Escalation/Stronghold (Hint: it should if it allows all the other supplements because they are designed to exist in a meta where superheavies do too otherwise Tau Fireblade Cadre with Screamerstars EVERYWHERE) then expect D weapons and plan accordingly and realize that 40k was never supposed to be cut-throat.

Inquisition Preview

Well well well. Some sort of war-band seems to be brewing...

Vengeance!

Fully painted turrets

Legion Basilisk? Hunter?

Thunderfire Cannons?